I think you have come up with one really strong argument which is that rural education should be supported and education ought to be brought to the indigenous communities rather than reserving places far from home. That would be a good line of argument for your second speaker. However, for the first speaker, I think you should discuss the SEAS application process which is the Special Entry Access Scheme which has a program that supports disadvantaged students getting into tertiary study:
www.vtac.edu.au/who/seas.htmlSome of the criteria for these applications include:
* By submitting category 1, you are giving permission for the following information to be passed onto institutions to which you have applied:
Age: will generally be used by institutions that recognise and operate mature age entry schemes
Gender: to identify if you are applying for a course in a male or female under-represented discipline
Language spoken at home and date of arrival to Australia (if applicable)-to identify and operate non-English speaking background consideration
Living and/or school postcode-to identify applicants from a regional or remote area or applicants who will need to move to undertake tertiary study
Recognition as an Indigenous Australian
Current school for school leavers-to identify if you attend one of various under-represented schools identified by institutions under this category-also refer to Category 5 if you are applying to La Trobe University, or Victoria University.
As you can see, "Recognition as an Indigenous Australian" is already catered for.
Now, what is the need to reserve places for the indigenous if there is already a program to cater for them?
Also, other problems with reserving places on top of the SEAS program are:
-what if you have a wealthy indigenous person who has had all the rights and privileges, if not more than a disadvantaged non-indigenous Australian, can they still take their place?
-also, you should research some of the animosity and hard feelings that are already held towards the indigenous receiving support from the government (eg.
www.hotheads.com.au/aboriginal.htm or google things like indigenous receive too many benefits) and you will see that there is a lot of tension between the non-indigenous and indigenous because each group have their own claim over what they perceive to be their land and their home. Providing indigenous exclusive benefits will raise unwanted and unneeded tension between the two communities and exacerbate (make worse) the situation when we are already trying to diplomatically build reconciliation between the two communities.
If anything, tertiary places exclusively awarded to the indigenous will do more damage to creating a sense of equality in the same way that people now 'hate' feminists because they believe they are asking 'too much'. It is much better to keep the SEAS scheme the way it is, evaluating people based on disadvantage, with consideration to their indigenous or rural background, rather than obvious special treatment.
I think the first speaker should research both the SEAS program and the tensions that are currently held towards the indigenous. I think the second speaker should go with your argument of bringing education to the indigenous instead to indigenous to the education.
I also think you should generate in this forum, all the oppositions arguments to make sure you have them covered in your own arguments or have rebuttal prepared.
I would like to have a meeting with you all Monday lunch time if possible to hear your speeches and rebut each of you? It really helped when I did it with Jemima last time.
Lets keep the discussion going and post what you have prepared or thought of here on the forum!